State v. Troyer

197 P.3d 620, 224 Or. App. 461, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 10, 2008
DocketC062008CR; A134476
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 P.3d 620 (State v. Troyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Troyer, 197 P.3d 620, 224 Or. App. 461, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.894. On appeal, she argues that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence, that the trial court committed plain error in admitting into evidence a laboratory report, and that the court erred in entering a conviction because there was no written waiver of her right to a trial by jury. We reject without discussion defendant’s argument that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence. The state concedes that the record does not contain a valid waiver of jury trial and that the error requires reversal of defendant’s conviction. We agree that the lack of a written jury waiver constitutes reversible error. See generally State v. Taxon, 142 Or App 484, 920 P2d 567 (1996). In light of our conclusion that defendant’s conviction must be reversed, we need not reach her assignment of error concerning the admission of the laboratory report.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Troyer
197 P.3d 620 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 P.3d 620, 224 Or. App. 461, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-troyer-orctapp-2008.