State v. Troutman

646 N.E.2d 460, 71 Ohio St. 3d 618

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 22, 1995·No. No. 94-2220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its decision denying the application to reopen the appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Troutman, 646 N.E.2d 460, 71 Ohio St. 3d 618 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

646 N.E.2d 460 (State v. Troutman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.