State v. Towns

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Towns

276 S.W.3d 357, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2009 WL 224069

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Towns. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 434 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2009·No. ED 91021·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Towns appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on misdemeanor charges of possession of a controlled substance (§ 195.202), third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer (§ 565.083), and resist *358 ing arrest (§ 575.150). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Towns appeals from his conviction after a jury trial on misdemeanor charges of possession of a controlled substance (§ 195.202), third-degree assault of a law enforcement officer (§ 565.083), and resist *358 ing arrest (§ 575.150). We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court did not err. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Towns, 276 S.W.3d 357, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2009 WL 224069 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

276 S.W.3d 357 (State v. Towns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.