State v. Towns

206 S.W.3d 397, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1754, 2006 WL 3377632
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. ED 86663·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tommie W. Towns (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of two counts of possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section [398]*398195.202.1 The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of five years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Towns, 206 S.W.3d 397, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1754, 2006 WL 3377632 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

206 S.W.3d 397 (State v. Towns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.