State v. Touissant

750 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 1202089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Touissant. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 La. LEXIS 3307
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 24, 1999·No. 99-K-1789·Published

Opinion

750 So.2d 980 (1999)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Shawn TOUISSANT.

No. 99-K-1789.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 24, 1999.

Denied. Result correct.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J., dissents from the denial of the application. The trial judge has almost unlimited discretion in accepting or rejecting race-neutral reasons given by the prosecutor after exercising a peremptory challenge. Here, the prosecutor rejected the prosecutor's reasons, but took no further action. At that point, the trial judge was required either to reinstate the juror in the venire or to dismiss the entire panel and select a new jury from a new petit venire. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 100 n. 24, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The judge's failure to take either action requires reversal of the conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Touissant, 750 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 1202089 (La. 1999).

750 So. 2d 980 (State v. Touissant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)