State v. Touissant

750 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 1202089
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 24, 1999
Docket99-K-1789
StatusPublished

This text of 750 So. 2d 980 (State v. Touissant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Touissant, 750 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 1202089 (La. 1999).

Opinion

750 So.2d 980 (1999)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Shawn TOUISSANT.

No. 99-K-1789.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

November 24, 1999.

Denied. Result correct.

KNOLL, J., not on panel.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J., dissents from the denial of the application. The trial judge has almost unlimited discretion in accepting or rejecting race-neutral reasons given by the prosecutor after exercising a peremptory challenge. Here, the prosecutor rejected the prosecutor's reasons, but took no further action. At that point, the trial judge was required either to reinstate the juror in the venire or to dismiss the entire panel and select a new jury from a new petit venire. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 100 n. 24, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The judge's failure to take either action requires reversal of the conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
750 So. 2d 980, 1999 WL 1202089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-touissant-la-1999.