Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. T.M.

State v. T.M.

126 So. 3d 286, 2011 WL 3111851, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 27, 2011
DocketNo. 3D10-2792
StatusPublished

This text of 126 So. 3d 286 (State v. T.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. T.M., 126 So. 3d 286, 2011 WL 3111851, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.090(f)(2) (stating an order extending speedy trial period for exceptional circumstances “shall recite the reasons for the extension and the length of the extension.”); C.S. v. State, 390 So.2d 457 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (noting the distinction between a continuance and an extension of the speedy trial period, and holding that the granting of a continuance does not serve to extend the speedy trial period without a finding by the trial court that the interests of justice will be served by such extension and a recitation of the reasons for such extension).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. S. v. State
390 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 So. 3d 286, 2011 WL 3111851, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tm-fladistctapp-2011.