C. S. v. State

390 So. 2d 457, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18130
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1980·No. No. 78-334·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge.

Appellant seeks review of an order of the trial court, which adjudicated the appellant a delinquent. By this appeal, the appellant alleges the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for discharge pursuant to Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180, in that the appellant was denied his right to speedy trial.

We agree and reverse the order appealed. The appellant was taken into custody October 4, 1977 on a charge of attempted purse snatching. Trial date was set for December 21, 1977, at which time the appellant’s special public defender failed to appear because he had not been notified of the appointment. At this time, the trial court orally continued the cause; however, the trial judge did not enter an order specifically extending speedy trial reciting the reasons for the extension as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180(c). Thereafter, the speedy trial period elapsed and the appellant moved for discharge, which was denied. He was then tried and adjudicated delinquent.

An oral continuance on the court’s own motion does not extend the time for speedy trial, without a finding that the interests of justice will be served by such extension and a recitation of the reasons for such extension, as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.180(c). See: In Interest of J.R.S. v. Hastings, 374 So.2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); In Interest of R.L.P. v. Korda, 380 So.2d 1329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

Therefore, absent a showing that the appellant was in any way at fault in delaying the adjudicatory hearing, we must reverse the order appealed and remand the cause to the trial court with instructions to discharge the child.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. S. v. State, 390 So. 2d 457, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18130 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

390 So. 2d 457 (C. S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. T.M.
126 So. 3d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
D.A.L. v. State
456 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Lancione
430 So. 2d 970 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
In the Interest of B. L. G.
414 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
VC v. Ferguson
422 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Rogers v. Keating
411 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
M. M. v. State
407 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
MM v. State
407 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
L. G. v. State
405 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
LG v. State
405 So. 2d 252 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
CS v. State
390 So. 2d 457 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)