State v. Thyfault

315 A.2d 424, 126 N.J. Super. 459
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedFebruary 20, 1974
StatusPublished

This text of 315 A.2d 424 (State v. Thyfault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thyfault, 315 A.2d 424, 126 N.J. Super. 459 (N.J. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

126 N.J. Super. 459 (1974)
315 A.2d 424

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACK THYFAULT AND THERESA SIRIMARCO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 21, 1974.
Decided February 20, 1974.

Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.

Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Steven J. Greenstein, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Michael H. Stieber, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Essex County Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Handler, 121 N.J. Super. 487.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Thyfault
297 A.2d 873 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
State v. Thyfault
315 A.2d 424 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
315 A.2d 424, 126 N.J. Super. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thyfault-njsuperctappdiv-1974.