State v. Thyfault
This text of 315 A.2d 424 (State v. Thyfault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JACK THYFAULT AND THERESA SIRIMARCO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LYNCH, MEHLER and MICHELS.
Mr. Thomas E. Durkin, Jr., argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Steven J. Greenstein, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. Michael H. Stieber, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Essex County Court is affirmed essentially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Handler, 121 N.J. Super. 487.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 A.2d 424, 126 N.J. Super. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thyfault-njsuperctappdiv-1974.