State v. Thompson
This text of 166 P.3d 575 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Leroy Edwin THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Rankin Johnson IV filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Anna M. Joyce, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant was convicted on one count of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, and one count of third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in imposing a compensatory fine of $1,000. Defendant asserts that no evidence was presented to support such a fine. The state concedes that such fines may not be imposed in the absence of evidence that, in this case, the victim has actually suffered a pecuniary loss. We find the state's concession to be well-taken and, consequently, accept it. See State v. Donahue, 165 Or.App. 143, 995 P.2d 1202 (2000).
Compensatory fine vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 P.3d 575, 214 Or. App. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-orctapp-2007.