State v. Thompson
674 P.2d 92, 66 Or. App. 496, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2508
Opinion
The trial court’s order finding defendant to be in contempt is inadequate in that it does not identify the statutory basis upon which it is entered. Accordingly, we cannot determine if it was proper.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.1
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Thompson, 674 P.2d 92, 66 Or. App. 496, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2508 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
674 P.2d 92 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Burkhart
723 P.2d 375 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
In re the Marriage of Yowman
717 P.2d 1243 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Baron
675 P.2d 1089 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
State v. Thompson
674 P.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)