State v. Thompson
674 P.2d 92, 66 Or. App. 496, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2508
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 11, 1984
Docket30217; CA A29258
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 674 P.2d 92 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Thompson, 674 P.2d 92, 66 Or. App. 496, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2508 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
Opinion
The trial court’s order finding defendant to be in contempt is inadequate in that it does not identify the statutory basis upon which it is entered. Accordingly, we cannot determine if it was proper.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Burkhart
723 P.2d 375 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
In re the Marriage of Yowman
717 P.2d 1243 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)
State v. Baron
675 P.2d 1089 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
State v. Thompson
674 P.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
674 P.2d 92, 66 Or. App. 496, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-orctapp-1984.