State v. Thompson

189 S.E.2d 767, 15 N.C. App. 243, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.C. App. 64
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided June 28, 1972·No. No. 7210SC482·Published

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant was represented at trial and on appeal by privately employed counsel. The appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to docket on time, and for failure to file brief when due. We have, however, considered the appeal on its merits and find no error.

No error.

Judges Morris and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 189 S.E.2d 767, 15 N.C. App. 243, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1887 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

189 S.E.2d 767 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.