State v. Thompson

189 S.E.2d 767, 15 N.C. App. 243, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1887
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJune 28, 1972
DocketNo. 7210SC482
StatusPublished

This text of 189 S.E.2d 767 (State v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thompson, 189 S.E.2d 767, 15 N.C. App. 243, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1887 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant was represented at trial and on appeal by privately employed counsel. The appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to docket on time, and for failure to file brief when due. We have, however, considered the appeal on its merits and find no error.

No error.

Judges Morris and Graham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 S.E.2d 767, 15 N.C. App. 243, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thompson-ncctapp-1972.