Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson

947 S.W.2d 545, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 1997 WL 354841
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2058 →
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1997·No. No. WD 53316·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Brian Thompson appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated and driving with a revoked license. His sole argument on appeal is that his conviction should be reversed because the officer who arrested him did not see him actually driving, so that no one can prove that he was the one driving the car. We find that there was sufficient circumstantial evidence from which the judge could have determined that Mr. Thompson drove the ear. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thompson, 947 S.W.2d 545, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1197, 1997 WL 354841 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

947 S.W.2d 545 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.