State v. Thompson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Thompson

900 S.W.2d 1, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 929, 1995 WL 293861

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thompson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2058 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 16, 1995·No. Nos. 64563, 66825·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael A. Thompson, appeals from his judgment of convictions, after a jury trial, for three counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He was sentenced, as a class X offender, to a concurrent 15 year term of imprisonment for each conviction. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

As to the defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a [2]*2written opinion. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael A. Thompson, appeals from his judgment of convictions, after a jury trial, for three counts of delivery of a controlled substance. He was sentenced, as a class X offender, to a concurrent 15 year term of imprisonment for each conviction. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing.

As to the defendant’s direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a [2]*2written opinion. The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

The judgment of the trial court denying defendant’s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Thompson, 900 S.W.2d 1, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 929, 1995 WL 293861 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

900 S.W.2d 1 (State v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.