State v. Thomas

922 N.E.2d 229, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1495
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Thomas. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Ohio St. 3d 412
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2010·No. 2009-1825·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 91891, 2009-Ohio-3461. Reported at 124 Ohio St.3d 1417, 2009-Ohio-6816, 919 N.E.2d 216. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent. O’Connor, J., dissents as to Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 922 N.E.2d 229, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2010).

922 N.E.2d 229 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bertram v. State
2009 Ohio 6816 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)