State v. Thomas

2010 Ohio 577, 922 N.E.2d 964, 124 Ohio St. 3d 412
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 2010·No. 2009-0630·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals entered on March 6, 2009 is vacated. The judgment of the trial court entered on May 12, 2009, resentencing appellee pursuant to the court of appeals’ judgment, is also vacated.

{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the trial court for a determination of whether postrelease control was properly imposed in appellee’s 2001 sentence and, if not, for resentencing.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently accepted. *413 Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott M. Heenan, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Thomas, 2010 Ohio 577, 922 N.E.2d 964, 124 Ohio St. 3d 412 (Ohio 2010).

2010 Ohio 577 (State v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bridgett
2017 Ohio 8480 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)