State v. . Thomas
38 S.E.2d 166, 226 N.C. 384, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454
Opinion
The defendant’s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to “charge the law and facts relative to this case.” As frankly admitted in defendant’s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.
The motion is allowed, and the judgment
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. . Thomas, 38 S.E.2d 166, 226 N.C. 384, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454 (N.C. 1946).
38 S.E.2d 166 (State v. . Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vanhoy
52 S.E.2d 278 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. Glatly
52 S.E.2d 277 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)