Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Thomas

State v. . Thomas

38 S.E.2d 166, 226 N.C. 384, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 22, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 S.E.2d 166 (State v. . Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Thomas, 38 S.E.2d 166, 226 N.C. 384, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454 (N.C. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant’s only exception was to the charge of the court for failure to “charge the law and facts relative to this case.” As frankly admitted in defendant’s brief this is unpointed broadside. Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., 428, 137 S. E., 175. The record shows the trial free from error. The Attorney-General moves in this Court that the judgment below be affirmed. The defendant does not resist the motion.

The motion is allowed, and the judgment

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vanhoy
52 S.E.2d 278 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. Glatly
52 S.E.2d 277 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.E.2d 166, 226 N.C. 384, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thomas-nc-1946.