State v. Thibodeaux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Thibodeaux

310 So. 2d 839, 1975 La. LEXIS 3652

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 18, 1975

DocketNo. 56108

StatusPublished

This text of 310 So. 2d 839 (State v. Thibodeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Thibodeaux, 310 So. 2d 839, 1975 La. LEXIS 3652 (La. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Roger F. Sallettes, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Gordon L. Bynum Judge of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 7th day of May, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 23rd day of May, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Roger F. Sallettes, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ granted. (See Order).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Gordon L. Bynum Judge of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Jefferson, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 7th day of May, 1975, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 23rd day of May, 1975, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

310 So. 2d 839, 1975 La. LEXIS 3652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thibodeaux-la-1975.