Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Thaxton

State v. Thaxton

35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 155
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 14, 2001
Docket209911231 A108344
StatusPublished

This text of 35 P.3d 1105 (State v. Thaxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Thaxton, 35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 155 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

35 P.3d 1105 (2001)
178 Or. App. 155

STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Robert Lee THAXTON, Appellant.

209911231; A108344

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 31, 2001.
Decided November 14, 2001.

David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was David E. Groom, State Public Defender.

Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

*1106 Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Crain, 177 Or.App. 627, 33 P.3d 1050 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Crain
33 P.3d 1050 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
State v. Thaxton
35 P.3d 1105 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 P.3d 1105, 178 Or. App. 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thaxton-orctapp-2001.