State v. Tejeda
826 P.2d 26, 111 Or. App. 398, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 329
This text of 826 P.2d 26 (State v. Tejeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Tejeda, 826 P.2d 26, 111 Or. App. 398, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 329 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).
Opinion
Defendant’s probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Tejeda
826 P.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
826 P.2d 26, 111 Or. App. 398, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tejeda-orctapp-1992.