State v. Tedder

219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2007 WL 1120298
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 2007
DocketED 87689
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 219 S.W.3d 788 (State v. Tedder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Tedder, 219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2007 WL 1120298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. Tedder appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no abuse of discretion. See State v. Simmons, 955 S.W.2d 729, 787 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tedder v. State
262 S.W.3d 261 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
Jefferson v. State
219 S.W.3d 788 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2007 WL 1120298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-tedder-moctapp-2007.