State v. Tedder

219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2007 WL 1120298
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2007·No. ED 87689·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. Tedder appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree sodomy. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no abuse of discretion. See State v. Simmons, 955 S.W.2d 729, 787 (Mo.banc 1997). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tedder, 219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 607, 2007 WL 1120298 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

219 S.W.3d 788 (State v. Tedder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tedder v. State
262 S.W.3d 261 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)
Jefferson v. State
219 S.W.3d 788 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)