Jefferson v. State

219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, 2007 WL 1120293
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 17, 2007
DocketED 87804
StatusPublished

This text of 219 S.W.3d 788 (Jefferson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jefferson v. State, 219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, 2007 WL 1120293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jule Jefferson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tedder
219 S.W.3d 788 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, 2007 WL 1120293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jefferson-v-state-moctapp-2007.