Jefferson v. State

219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, 2007 WL 1120293
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 17, 2007·No. ED 87804·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jule Jefferson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jefferson v. State, 219 S.W.3d 788, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 608, 2007 WL 1120293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

219 S.W.3d 788 (Jefferson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Tedder
219 S.W.3d 788 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)