State v. Taylor

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Miranda Kay Taylor, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001267

Appeal From Horry County William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-179 Submitted April 1, 2021 – Filed May 19, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.