State v. Taylor

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 19, 2021
Docket2019-001267
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Taylor (State v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Taylor, (S.C. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Miranda Kay Taylor, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001267

Appeal From Horry County William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-179 Submitted April 1, 2021 – Filed May 19, 2021

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Taylor Davis Gilliam, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Taylor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-taylor-scctapp-2021.