State v. Taylor

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 366 N.C. 408
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 6, 2015·No. 317PA14·Published

Opinion

No. 317PA14 TENTH DISTRICT FILED 6 NOVEMBER 2015

SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

****************

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) v. ) From Wake County ) RODNEY NIGEE PLEDGER TAYLOR )

****************

ORDER

This case comes before the Court by way of defendant’s petition for

discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31. We also allowed the State’s

conditional petition for discretionary review as to additional issues.

We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals in part and remand this case

to the Court of Appeals to consider defendant’s Fifth Amendment argument on the

merits. As to all other issues in defendant’s petition for discretionary review, and as

to all issues in the State’s conditional petition for discretionary review, we conclude

that discretionary review was improvidently allowed.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of November, 2015.

_______________________________ For the Court WITNESS my hand and the seal of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, this the 5th day of November, 2015.

CHRISTIE S. CAMERON ROEDER Clerk of the Supreme Court

_______________________________ Assistant Clerk

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, (N.C. 2015).

State v. Taylor (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 7A-31
North Carolina § 7A-31