State v. Taylor

736 S.E.2d 180, 366 N.C. 408, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1288, 2012 WL 6914087
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 12, 2012·No. 340P12·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

1. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Appropriate Relief (COA09-1360)

2. Def’s Pro Se PWC to Review Order of COA

3. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Proceed In Forma Paupems

4. Def’s Pro Se Motion for an Order for Retrial

5. Def’s Pro Se Motion to Suppress Articles of Prosecution

6. Def’s Pro Se Motion for a New Hearing Before a New Grand Jury

7. Def’s Pro Se Motion for a Change of Venue

8. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Dismissal of Charges

9. Def’s Pro Se Motion for an Immediate and Prompt Response

10. Def’s Pro Se Motion for Counsel to be Appointed

1. Dismissed
2. Dismissed
3. Allowed
4. Dismissed
5. Dismissed
6. Dismissed
7. Dismissed
8. Dismissed
9. Denied
10. Dismissed as Moot

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, 736 S.E.2d 180, 366 N.C. 408, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1288, 2012 WL 6914087 (N.C. 2012).

736 S.E.2d 180 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Forte
822 S.E.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019)
State v. Cox
808 S.E.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2017)
State v. West
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2014