State v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Taylor

547 S.W.3d 827

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 823 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 29, 2018·No. WD 80339·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Tara Monique Taylor appeals from her convictions for felony child abuse and second-degree child endangerment. Taylor contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged misconduct. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our *828decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Tara Monique Taylor appeals from her convictions for felony child abuse and second-degree child endangerment. Taylor contends the circuit court erred in admitting evidence of uncharged misconduct. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our *828decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

State v. Taylor, 547 S.W.3d 827 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

547 S.W.3d 827 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.