State v. Taylor
577 S.W.3d 178
Opinion
*179Chauncy Taylor appeals the judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree statutory sodomy and first-degree child molestation. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Taylor, 577 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).
577 S.W.3d 178 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chauncy Taylor, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2022