State v. Taylor

936 S.W.2d 235, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1453
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 1996·No. Nos. 65743, 69558·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of first degree assault, § 565.050, RSMo 1986, and one count of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, 936 S.W.2d 235, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2057 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

936 S.W.2d 235 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.