State v. Taylor

930 S.W.2d 482, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1642, 1996 WL 570571
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Taylor. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1453
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 8, 1996·No. Nos. 68179, 70011·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Michael E. Taylor, appeals the judgment entered on his convictions for attempted forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo Supp.1993, forcible sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo Supp.1993, two counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, and burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, RSMo 1994. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. These appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15®. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Taylor, 930 S.W.2d 482, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1642, 1996 WL 570571 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

930 S.W.2d 482 (State v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.