State v. Tankel

596 So. 2d 533, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4684, 1992 WL 79711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 1992·No. No. 91-1242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred by sentencing the defendant to less than the mandatory minimum sentence required for a sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. We reverse and remand for a resentencing to the mandatory minimum sentence. State v. Ratliff, 592 So.2d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); State v. Vola, 591 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Lane, 582 So.2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

LETTS, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Tankel, 596 So. 2d 533, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4684, 1992 WL 79711 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

596 So. 2d 533 (State v. Tankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vola
591 So. 2d 248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Scates
585 So. 2d 385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Lane
582 So. 2d 77 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
State v. Ratliff
592 So. 2d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)