Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Ratliff

State v. Ratliff

592 So. 2d 315, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767, 1991 WL 275560
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 1991
DocketNo. 91-0079
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 592 So. 2d 315 (State v. Ratliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ratliff, 592 So. 2d 315, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767, 1991 WL 275560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred by sentencing the defendant to less than the mandatory minimum sentence required for a sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. We reverse and remand for a resentencing to the mandatory minimum sentence. See State v. Vola, 591 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baxter, 581 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

GUNTHER, J., concurs. ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur specially with opinions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Tankel
596 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
592 So. 2d 315, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767, 1991 WL 275560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ratliff-fladistctapp-1991.