State v. Ratliff
592 So. 2d 315, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767, 1991 WL 275560
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 1991·No. No. 91-0079·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
The trial court erred by sentencing the defendant to less than the mandatory minimum sentence required for a sale of cocaine within 1,000 feet of a school. We reverse and remand for a resentencing to the mandatory minimum sentence. See State v. Vola, 591 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). See also State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baumgardner, 587 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); State v. Baxter, 581 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Ratliff, 592 So. 2d 315, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 12767, 1991 WL 275560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
592 So. 2d 315 (State v. Ratliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tankel
596 So. 2d 533 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)