State v. Talo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Talo. Read the opinion of the Court — 153 Haw. 63
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 2022·No. SCWC-20-0000457·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-OCT-2022 10:33 AM Dkt. 7 OGAC SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI __________________________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee

vs.

LOGOVII TALO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CR. NO. 1PC161000667)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit Judge Malinao, in place of Nakayama, J., recused.)

The application for writ of certiorari filed on August 29,

2022, by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Logovii Talo is hereby

accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each of the parties shall file a

supplemental brief by November 4, 2022, not to exceed ten pages

in length, addressing whether the imposition of special

condition Q was consistent with HRS § 706-624(2) and this court’s holding in State v. Kahawai, 103 Hawaiʻi 462, 83 P.3d 725

(2004).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 11, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Talo, (haw 2022).

State v. Talo (State v. Talo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kahawai
83 P.3d 725 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2004)