State v. Talo
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-SEP-2022
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 07:57 AM Dkt. 22 ODAC
IN THE SUPRME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LOGOVII TALO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and JASON M. KRAMBERG, Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CR. N). 1PC161000667)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit Judge Malinao, in place of Nakayama, J., recused.)
The application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 2022, by Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant Jason M. Kramberg is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 28, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Talo (State v. Talo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.