State v. Talo
This text of State v. Talo (State v. Talo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 28-SEP-2022 SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 07:57 AM Dkt. 22 ODAC IN THE SUPRME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI __________________________________________________________________________________
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LOGOVII TALO, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and JASON M. KRAMBERG, Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant ________________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CR. N). 1PC161000667)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Wilson, and Eddins, JJ., and Circuit Judge Malinao, in place of Nakayama, J., recused.)
The application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 2022, by Petitioner/Real-Party-In-Interest-Appellant Jason M. Kramberg is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 28, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Talo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-talo-haw-2022.