State v. Suffecool

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Suffecool

722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 39

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 2000

Docket99-765

StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 90 (State v. Suffecool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Suffecool, 722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 39 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, to participate in oral argument scheduled for January 12, 2000, .

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, to participate in oral argument scheduled for January 12, 2000, .

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-suffecool-ohio-2000.