State v. Suffecool

722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 39
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Suffecool. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 Ohio St. 3d 1441
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 2000·No. 99-765·Published

Opinion

Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, to participate in oral argument scheduled for January 12, 2000, .

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Suffecool, 722 N.E.2d 90, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 39 (Ohio 2000).

722 N.E.2d 90 (State v. Suffecool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.