State v. Suffecool

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Suffecool

713 N.E.2d 1052, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2530

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 4, 1999·No. 99-765·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. The discretionary appeal is allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

[1442] Sua sponte, this cause is to be argued on the same date as 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191.

Sua sponte, 99-764, State v. Worthy, Portage App. No. 97-P-0059, is to be briefed on Propositions of Law Nos. I through V and is to be argued on the same date as 99-286 and 99-765.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stark App. No. 1998CA00101. The discretionary appeal is allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. Ill, IV, and V.

[1442] Sua sponte, this cause is to be argued on the same date as 99-286, State v. Williams, Lake App. No. 97-L-191.

Sua sponte, 99-764, State v. Worthy, Portage App. No. 97-P-0059, is to be briefed on Propositions of Law Nos. I through V and is to be argued on the same date as 99-286 and 99-765.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

State v. Suffecool, 713 N.E.2d 1052, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1441, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 2530 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

713 N.E.2d 1052 (State v. Suffecool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related