State v. Stout

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Stout

342 S.W.3d 438, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 835, 2011 WL 2313783

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2011·No. WD 72633·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*439 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Donny Stout was convicted in the Boone County Circuit Court of first-degree statutory sodomy and child abuse. On appeal, Stout argues: first, that the trial court plainly erred in failing to suppress photographs admitted into evidence on the basis that the underlying search warrant was not supported by probable cause; and second, that the trial court erroneously failed to declare a mistrial after the State inquired on cross-examination whether Stout had served time in prison for a prior conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*439 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Donny Stout was convicted in the Boone County Circuit Court of first-degree statutory sodomy and child abuse. On appeal, Stout argues: first, that the trial court plainly erred in failing to suppress photographs admitted into evidence on the basis that the underlying search warrant was not supported by probable cause; and second, that the trial court erroneously failed to declare a mistrial after the State inquired on cross-examination whether Stout had served time in prison for a prior conviction. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Stout, 342 S.W.3d 438, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 835, 2011 WL 2313783 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

342 S.W.3d 438 (State v. Stout) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related