State v. Marsh
342 S.W.3d 438, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2011 WL 2313734
Opinion
ORDER
Adam Marsh appeals his conviction on two counts of first-degree sodomy. Appellant contends the circuit court plainly erred in excluding evidence regarding one of the victims’ prior experience with sexual abuse. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Marsh, 342 S.W.3d 438, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2011 WL 2313734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
342 S.W.3d 438 (State v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Stout
342 S.W.3d 438 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)