State v. Stone

Supreme Court of Iowa

State v. Stone

40 Iowa 547

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedJune 14, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 40 Iowa 547 (State v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Stone, 40 Iowa 547 (iowa 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

Cole, J.

The indictment charges that on January, 1872, the defendant “ was legally elected, qualified and acting treasurer of Sioux county, Iowa; that he was such officer, and acted in such capacity for the years 1870 and 1871, and up to April 10, 1872,” and then proceeds to charge in proper form the facts constituting the crime of embezzlement of public money by officers, as defined by Code, Section 3908. Upon the trial, the district attorney in various forms offered to prove that the defendant was the acting county treasurer of Sioux county, at the time the moneys were embezzled. This the court refused. The district attorney also asked an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed the defendant was the.acting county [548]*548treasurer for the years 1870 and 1871, and while such, took the moneys as charged, and converted the same to his own use, they should find him guilty. This was refused by the court. In each and all of these rulings the court was very manifestly in error. If one holds himself out to be an officer, or acts.as an officer de facto, he cannot be heard to object that lie is not an officer de jure, because his acting in the office estops him to deny his right to it, even when indicted for malfeasance. 1 Bish. on Cr. Law, § 917, and cases cited in note 3; 2 Whart. on Cr. Law, § 2533, and cases cited in note t. (See as to the effect of this reversal, Code, 4539.)

Beversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cole, J.

The indictment charges that on January, 1872, the defendant “ was legally elected, qualified and acting treasurer of Sioux county, Iowa; that he was such officer, and acted in such capacity for the years 1870 and 1871, and up to April 10, 1872,” and then proceeds to charge in proper form the facts constituting the crime of embezzlement of public money by officers, as defined by Code, Section 3908. Upon the trial, the district attorney in various forms offered to prove that the defendant was the acting county treasurer of Sioux county, at the time the moneys were embezzled. This the court refused. The district attorney also asked an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed the defendant was the.acting county [548]*548treasurer for the years 1870 and 1871, and while such, took the moneys as charged, and converted the same to his own use, they should find him guilty. This was refused by the court. In each and all of these rulings the court was very manifestly in error. If one holds himself out to be an officer, or acts.as an officer de facto, he cannot be heard to object that lie is not an officer de jure, because his acting in the office estops him to deny his right to it, even when indicted for malfeasance. 1 Bish. on Cr. Law, § 917, and cases cited in note 3; 2 Whart. on Cr. Law, § 2533, and cases cited in note t. (See as to the effect of this reversal, Code, 4539.)

Beversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Iowa 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stone-iowa-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack