State v. Stenbak
This text of 2020 ND 122 (State v. Stenbak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 122
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark Stenbak, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190401
Appeal from the District Court of Mountrail County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State’s Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. State v. Stenbak No. 20190401
[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2020 ND 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-stenbak-nd-2020.