State v. St. John

844 P.2d 947, 118 Or. App. 95, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 128
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 3, 1993
Docket91CR2444; CA A73366
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 844 P.2d 947 (State v. St. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. St. John, 844 P.2d 947, 118 Or. App. 95, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 128 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted on two counts of attempted rape, ORS 161.405; ORS 163.375, one count of sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427, and one count of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree. ORS 161.405; ORS 163.427. He contends that the court erred in the consecutive sentence imposed for Count 2, attempted rape, because it used the incorrect criminal history category. The state concedes that the court was incorrect in using category E. We accept the state’s concession.

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on Count 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. St. John
863 P.2d 1317 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
844 P.2d 947, 118 Or. App. 95, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-st-john-orctapp-1993.