State v. Sprague

50 S.W. 1117, 149 Mo. 425, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 9, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 S.W. 1117 (State v. Sprague) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Sprague, 50 S.W. 1117, 149 Mo. 425, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 38 (Mo. 1899).

Opinion

SHERWOOD, J.

This time Wesley and Jack were indicted for burglary and larceny perpetrated in the store house of Smith & Peck. They were convicted of burglary alone, however, and their respective punishments for such wrongdoing assessed at three years in the penitentiary.

The court, of its own motion, and over the objection and exception of defendants gave instruction 5 in relation to an accomplice which displays the same error as that commented on about instruction 4, in State v. Wesley Sprague (wherein Wesley was convicted of larceny of the goods of the Dent County Mercantile Company, and Jack acquitted).

The instruction in that case, as in this, did not define the word “corroboration.”

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Burns
173 S.W. 1070 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Young Chung v. State
136 P. 631 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.W. 1117, 149 Mo. 425, 1899 Mo. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sprague-mo-1899.