State v. Speight

637 S.E.2d 539
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Speight. Read the opinion of the Court — 359 N.C. 602
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 15, 2006·No. No. 491PA04-2.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon reconsideration of this case in light of Washington v. Recuenco, 548 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2546, 165 L.Ed.2d 466 (2006), we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals insofar as it held defendant's sentence was imposed in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, 166 N.C.App. 106, 177-18, 602 S.E.2d 4, 12 (2004), and remand to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision in State v. Timothy Earl Blackwell, ___ N.C. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___, 2006 WL 3690958 (2006). However, the portion of the Court of Appeals opinion finding no prejudicial error in defendant's convictions as specified in that opinion remains undisturbed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Speight, 637 S.E.2d 539 (N.C. 2006).

637 S.E.2d 539 (State v. Speight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington v. Recuenco
548 U.S. 212 (Supreme Court, 2006)
State v. Speight
602 S.E.2d 4 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)