State v. Spaulding

643 N.E.2d 112, 71 Ohio St. 3d 228
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. 94-1474·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. A.W. Sweeney and Wright, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spaulding, 643 N.E.2d 112, 71 Ohio St. 3d 228 (Ohio 1994).

643 N.E.2d 112 (State v. Spaulding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van Hook v. Anderson
127 F. Supp. 2d 899 (S.D. Ohio, 2001)
State v. Spaulding
1994 Ohio 42 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)