State v. Solomon

720 So. 2d 241, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 572, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2104, 1998 WL 750920
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 29, 1998·No. No. 93188·Published

Opinions

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Solomon v. State, 720 So.2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Mays v. State, 693 So.2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See Mays v. State, 717 So.2d 515, 23 Fla. L. Weekly S387 (Fla.1998) (holding that under section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes (1995), if the “true” recommended guidelines sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the guidelines sentence [242] must be imposed). Accordingly, we quash Solomon.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and OVERTON and WELLS, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion, in which KOGAN and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Solomon, 720 So. 2d 241, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 572, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2104, 1998 WL 750920 (Fla. 1998).

720 So. 2d 241 (State v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mays v. State
693 So. 2d 52 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Mays v. State
717 So. 2d 515 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)
Solomon v. State
720 So. 2d 1084 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)