Solomon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Solomon v. State

705 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1998 WL 64025

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 1998

DocketNo. 97-1387

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 705 So. 2d 144 (Solomon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Solomon v. State, 705 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1998 WL 64025 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer without violence and felony failure to appear before a court. The state concedes, and we agree, that the written order of probation and sentencing order contain scriveners errors which reflect that appellant was sentenced to nine months in county jail for possession of drug paraphernalia. The state nol prossed that charge. It is apparent from the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended to sentence appellant to nine months in county jail for his convic[145]*145tion of resisting an officer without violence. Therefore, we remand to correct the probation and sentencing orders.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences for battery on a law enforcement officer, resisting an officer without violence and felony failure to appear before a court. The state concedes, and we agree, that the written order of probation and sentencing order contain scriveners errors which reflect that appellant was sentenced to nine months in county jail for possession of drug paraphernalia. The state nol prossed that charge. It is apparent from the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended to sentence appellant to nine months in county jail for his convic[145]*145tion of resisting an officer without violence. Therefore, we remand to correct the probation and sentencing orders.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 So. 2d 144, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1379, 1998 WL 64025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solomon-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack