State v. Smith
35 N.E.2d 968, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 612, 1941 Ohio App. LEXIS 1041
Opinion
OPINION
Submitted on motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with §13459-3 GC in that the appellant did not file his brief with the transcript. The failure to file brief with the transcript is conceded by appellant.
We are committed to the enforcement of this statute, which we have heretofore held to be mandatory in terms. State v Jarcho, 30 Abs 645.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Smith, 35 N.E.2d 968, 33 Ohio Law. Abs. 612, 1941 Ohio App. LEXIS 1041 (Ohio Ct. App. 1941).
35 N.E.2d 968 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Dayton v. Swartzel
100 N.E.2d 443 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1950)
State v. Moore
85 N.E.2d 595 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
State, Ex Rel. Merrill v. Moore
82 N.E.2d 323 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1948)
Cincinnati (City) v. Hawkins
78 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1947)
State v. Davis
69 N.E.2d 532 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1946)
State v. Barber
65 N.E.2d 669 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1945)
Columbus v. Balzan
49 N.E.2d 592 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1942)
State v. Brunswick
44 N.E.2d 116 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1941)