State v. Moore
This text of 85 N.E.2d 595 (State v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The cause is submitted on motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with the provisions of Section 13459-3, General Code, in that appellant failed to file his brief with the transcript.
The provisions of Section 13459-3, General Code, are mandatory and a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained for failure to comply therewith. State v. Trimmer, 80 Ohio App., 545, 547, 76 N. E. (2d), 896; State v. Jarcho, 65 Ohio App., 417, 30 N. E. (2d), 444; State v. Parnell, 56 Ohio App., 77, 10 N. E. (2d), 18; State v. Bell, 52 Ohio App., 11, 2 N. E. (2d), 786; State v. Davis, 47 Ohio Law Abs., 415; State v. Barber, 44 Ohio Law Abs., 381, 65 N. E. (2d), 669; City of Columbus v. Balzan, 38 Ohio Law Abs., 141, 49 N. E. (2d), 592; State v. Smith, 33 Ohio Law Abs., 612, 35 N. E. (2d), 968.
Motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.
Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.E.2d 595, 84 Ohio App. 91, 39 Ohio Op. 116, 1948 Ohio App. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-moore-ohioctapp-1948.